Reported by Ngresangma Martha- 4/04/2024
Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia declared his commitment to greater accountability to the Ghanaian people compared to his predecessor, John Dramani Mahama. However, criticisms mounted as economic performance and transparency came under scrutiny.
Stephen Sedem Deebge, a prominent voice in a discussion, argued that Mahama’s tenure displayed higher levels of accountability than the current administration’s seven-plus years. He referenced Mahama’s hands-on approach to economic matters, citing his appointment of Amissah-Arthur as head of the economic team in late 2010, under President Mills. Deebge emphasized Mahama’s adept handling of public debt, contrasting it with Bawumia’s purported mismanagement leading to a staggering increase to 600 billion Ghana cedis by 2022.
Highlighting specific instances, Deebge pointed out alleged conflicts of interest, such as a portion of loans benefiting the finance minister’s company. He also drew attention to the significant depreciation of the Ghanaian cedi against major currencies under the current administration, contrasting it with the relative stability during Mahama’s tenure, where the cedi was valued at less than two cedis in 2013, compared to nearly 14 cedis today.
The discussion escalated in Parliament’s probe into COVID-19 funds, with Deebge expressing skepticism about the government’s handling of the pandemic. He questioned the transparency of the funds’ allocation, suggesting disbelief in the presence of COVID-19 in Ghana, citing concerns over the government’s response.
In response, Bawumia staunchly defended his administration’s track record, asserting his commitment to accountability and dismissing allegations of economic mismanagement. However, critics remained unconvinced, citing ongoing economic challenges and perceived lack of transparency in governance.
The exchange underscores deep-seated divisions regarding economic stewardship and accountability within Ghanaian politics. As the nation navigates its developmental trajectory, questions surrounding transparency, economic policy, and leadership accountability continue to fuel public discourse.
